News

U.S. Judge Rules- Citizens Have No Right To Grow Food

The abuse of power by this judge has locals in an uproar recently. Make sure to watch the video at the end of this article, and leave a comment on why you think this judge is being absolutely ridiculous.

A Miami-Dade judge has ruled that the upscale city of Miami Shores has every right to take legal action against citizens who plant vegetables in their own front yard. Her reasoning? They’re just too ugly…

The ten-page ruling by Judge Monica Gordo was based on the three-year long legal battle of Tom Carroll and Hermine Ricketts, who are facing fines of $50 per day for growing their own food.

From The Mind Unleashed:

For 17 years, the couple grew their own food in their front yard until one day, the state came knocking.

No one was harmed by the couple’s garden, it was entirely organic, and in nearly two decades, not one of their neighbors ever complained. The only injured party in this ridiculous act was the state.

According to the tyrannical legislation, all homeowners are subject to the same absurd constraints. Their yards must be covered in grass — that is the law.

“There certainly is not a fundamental right to grow vegetables in your front yard,” Richard Sarafan, attorney for Miami Shores, said at the start of the case. “Aesthetics and uniformity are legitimate government purposes. Not every property can lawfully be used for every purpose.”

The hubris that it takes to claim that no one has a right to grow vegetables in their front yard is mind blowing. Carroll and Ricketts’ yard is not publicly owned and is not subject to the government’s ‘uniformity’ code — especially when all they are doing is growing food.

This case is different than many of the other gardening cases that arise across the country as the majority of front yard gardens are opposed by Home Owner Associations — not the government. When an HOA tells someone they cannot grow a garden it’s because that person voluntarily agreed to the rules.

Unlike members of HOAs, however, Carroll and Ricketts never agreed to these arbitrary constraints on their private property, which happened to be imposed on them nearly two decades after they’d been growing their own food.”

Carroll and Rickets, however, refused to back down.

“I am disappointed by today’s ruling,” Ricketts told the Miami Herald. “My garden not only provided us with food, but it was also beautiful and added character to the community. I look forward to continuing this fight and ultimately winning so I can once again use my property productively instead of being forced to have a useless lawn.”

Indeed!

The couple’s lawyer, Ari Bargil with the Institute of Justice, made this statement:

“If Hermine and Tom wanted to grow fruit or flowers or display pink flamingos, Miami Shores would have been completely fine with it. They should be equally free to grow food for their own consumption, which they did for 17 years before the village forced them to uproot the very source of their sustenance.”

 

References: Three Percenter Nation

 

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Elaine

    April 5, 2019 at 7:20 pm

    This sounds like over reach of another government entity.
    No harm no foul.
    A WELL MAINTAINED vegtable garden IS BEAUTIFUL.
    Leave them and all like minded individuals alone.

  2. mike taylor

    April 5, 2019 at 8:40 pm

    Did she get her degree from cracker jacks box?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FDA Disclaimer

None of the statements on this website have been evaluated by Food and Drug Administration. The efficacy of any products or information has not been confirmed by FDA-approved research. The products mentioned are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
LocalGrowersConnection assumes no responsibility for the improper use of and self-diagnosis and/or treatment using these products or information.
Any information on the website is provided for educational and informational purposes only, and is not intended to be a substitute for a health care provider’s consultation.
Please consult a health care professional about potential interactions or other possible complications on any matter related to your health.

To Top